: Par Gruziju
The whole drama as the eerie sense of history repeating itself. The London Times today carries an article about “The Revolt in Georgia”–not the one unfolding before our eyes, but the revolt against Soviet occupation in September 1924. The Soviets had initially recognized Georgia’s independence in the wake of the First World War, but occipied the country in 1921 and brutally put down the revolt that erupted three years later. At the time, the president of Georgia made an appeal to the League of Nations. The Times reports that although “sympathetic reference” to Georgia was made in the assembly, “it is realized that the League is incapable of rendering material aid and the moral influence which may be a powerful force with civilized countries is unlikely to to make an impression upon Soviet Russia.”
That was in 1924. What sort of impression do you suppose the “moral influence” of the successor institution to the League of Nations, the U.N., is likely to have on the uncivilized successor to the U.S.S.R.?
Pilnais teksts šeit
The whole drama as the eerie sense of history repeating itself. The London Times today carries an article about “The Revolt in Georgia”–not the one unfolding before our eyes, but the revolt against Soviet occupation in September 1924. The Soviets had initially recognized Georgia’s independence in the wake of the First World War, but occipied the country in 1921 and brutally put down the revolt that erupted three years later. At the time, the president of Georgia made an appeal to the League of Nations. The Times reports that although “sympathetic reference” to Georgia was made in the assembly, “it is realized that the League is incapable of rendering material aid and the moral influence which may be a powerful force with civilized countries is unlikely to to make an impression upon Soviet Russia.”
That was in 1924. What sort of impression do you suppose the “moral influence” of the successor institution to the League of Nations, the U.N., is likely to have on the uncivilized successor to the U.S.S.R.?
Pilnais teksts šeit
Mūzika: Nine Inch Nails
: "Separātistu valdība"
Because there is no way the regime in South Ossetia can be in any sense called "separatist." Who there is a separatist? The head of the local KGB, Anatoly Baranov, used to head the Federal Security Service (FSB) in the Russian Republic of Mordovia. The head of the South Ossetian Interior Ministry, Mikhail Mindzayev, served in the Interior Ministry of Russia's North Ossetia. The South Ossetian "defense minister," Vasily Lunev, used to be military commissar in Perm Oblast, and the secretary of South Ossetia's Security Council, Anatoly Barankevich, is a former deputy military commissar of Stavropol Krai. So who exactly is a separatist in this government? South Ossetian "prime minister" Yury Morozov?
Pilnais teksts šeit Raksta autoram var piekrist/nepiekrist bet "valdības" sastāvs atgādina čekistu grillpartiju kalnu kūrortā. Tas nenozīmē, ka neeksistē problēmas gruzīnu-osetīnu starpā, bet neliekas ticami, ka augšminētā kompānija ir ieinteresēta tās risināt.
Because there is no way the regime in South Ossetia can be in any sense called "separatist." Who there is a separatist? The head of the local KGB, Anatoly Baranov, used to head the Federal Security Service (FSB) in the Russian Republic of Mordovia. The head of the South Ossetian Interior Ministry, Mikhail Mindzayev, served in the Interior Ministry of Russia's North Ossetia. The South Ossetian "defense minister," Vasily Lunev, used to be military commissar in Perm Oblast, and the secretary of South Ossetia's Security Council, Anatoly Barankevich, is a former deputy military commissar of Stavropol Krai. So who exactly is a separatist in this government? South Ossetian "prime minister" Yury Morozov?
Pilnais teksts šeit Raksta autoram var piekrist/nepiekrist bet "valdības" sastāvs atgādina čekistu grillpartiju kalnu kūrortā. Tas nenozīmē, ka neeksistē problēmas gruzīnu-osetīnu starpā, bet neliekas ticami, ka augšminētā kompānija ir ieinteresēta tās risināt.
: Fragmenti no diskusijām par un ap Gruziju
European arms consist of a few border guards and “diversity” programs to insure gay peacekeepers in the Congo and the like. Disarmament has it’s price and we are seeing it now.
Nuke DC and we’ll just hold new elections. Nuke Peking or Moscow and those regimes fall and the nations go into anarchy and civil war.
European arms consist of a few border guards and “diversity” programs to insure gay peacekeepers in the Congo and the like. Disarmament has it’s price and we are seeing it now.
Nuke DC and we’ll just hold new elections. Nuke Peking or Moscow and those regimes fall and the nations go into anarchy and civil war.