Indeed once we think of the world in this way, as a total movement of becoming which builds itself into the forms we see, and in which each form takes shape in continuous relation to those around it, then the distinction between the animate and the inanimate seems to dissolve. The world itself takes on the character of an organism, and the movements of animals – including those of us human beings – are parts or aspects of its life-process (Lovelock 1979). This means that in dwelling in the world, we do not act upon it, or do things to it; rather we move along with it. Our actions do not transform the world, they are part and parcel of the world’s transforming itself. And that is just another way of saying that they belong to time.
//Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.
//Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.
nošķaudīties