but don't you find that what you call 'real' is just some concept you have attached to yourself what you think you should be like? as in - you want to be real to people, but what does it mean? what is your 'real' self? how would you treat them to be real? what parts of yourself would you show that are ultimately 'real'?

es laikam esmu sapratusi, ka prieksh manis real buutu iztureeties pret cilveekiem taa, ka i would recognize and acknowledge that they are just as human as i am with faults and dramatic inner life, neizlikties, ka es neredzu un nesaprotu muusu shared human condition. nepieveert acis uz to, ka vinjiem ir tiesiibas justies kaa vinji grib un iztureeties kaa vinji grib un ka tam ir savi iemesli, un tas ka man tas izraisa nepatiku vai aizkaitinaajumu, ka taa nav vinju vaina, taa nav mana vaina, taa nav neviena vaina. so ja es gribu iztureeties pret cilveekiem as my real self, tad man pret vinjiem ir jaaizturas ar 100% sapratni un respektu, tieshi taapat kaa man buutu veelams iztureeties pret sevi un jebko kas eksistee paaulee, jo nekas nav labaaks par kaut ko citu.

un ir ljoti gruuti iztureeties pret cilveekiem ar 100% sapratni, dziivojot visaadu conditioned konceptu pasaulee. like ir gruuti iztureeties pretimnaakoshi un atveerti, lai arii tas ir vieniigais veids, kaa var nodibinaat to saikni ar otru cilveeku, kas ir nepiecieshama prieksh effortless komunikaacijas un mijiedarbiibas.

all this vienkaarshi prieksh paardomaam, kas tad ir tas iistais veids kaa tu iztureetos pret cilveekiem, ja vareetu?