Tā ir pazīme, nevis definīcija. šajā gadījumā tiek uzskatīts, ka resursi kļūst patiešām nepietiekami, nevis sliktāk sadalīti, un agrozeme tiek noplacināta, pārtika zemākas kvalitātes utt.

ah, un vēl par lielpilsētām viņš rakstīja:
"Over-population and over-organization have produced the modern metropolis, in which a fully human life of multiple personal relationships has become almost impossible. Therefore, if you wish to avoid the spiritual impoverishment of individuals and whole societies, leave the metropolis and revive the small country community, or alternately humanize the metropolis by creating within its network of mechanical organization the urban equivalents of small country communities, in which individuals can meet and cooperate as complete persons, not as the mere embodiments of specialized functions" :))))

Un vēl to, ka tā laika jaunatnei bija diezgan vienaldzīga brīvība.
"recent public opinion polls have revealed that an actual majority of young people in their teens, the voters of tomorrow, have no faith in democratic institutions, see no objection to the censorship of unpopular ideas, do not believe that government of the people by the people is possible and would be perfectly content, if they can continue to live in the style to which the boom has accustomed them, to be ruled, from above, by an oligarchy of assorted experts"