Заметки алкоголика и придурка
16. Jūnijs 2023
16:30
https://twitter.com/Lucas_Gage_/sta
protams, tivterists drirš, par kaut kādu "live tv", ko var izmantot pret viņu, bet dokumeņķik(e)s interesants.
17:32
On this day in 1967, Israel attacked the USS Liberty, killing 34 American sailors and wounding 174 more. They then tried to blame it on the Egyptians, hoping America would join in their war. This was not the first time, nor would it be the last, that Israel perpetrated a false flag operation against its closest ally, the United States.
Hitler was right.17:40
-I doubt their money has anything to do with "talent". Perhaps Soros is just a glowie middleman.
-Soros, like all Jews that operate within the realm of high finance, made his money by colluding with his network of Jewish embezzlers, fraudsters and gangsters. Their talent is for organization and parasitism. They don't produce anything other than complex financial instruments which are just legal contracts that allow them to engage in glorified insider trading and Ponzi schemes on a massive global scale. They then use bribery to keep themselves out of prison when they inevitably get caught and their absolute control over the media prevents the general public from being aware of their misdeeds.
That is the reason for him sponsoring District Attorneys in the United States. It's not so they let rabid black criminals out on the streets to attack productive citizens and sow chaos, that's just a bonus. The real reason is so when their financial schemes collapse in on themselves the DA will be there to either ignore the case or offer favourable terms when their crimes are too egregious to be brushed aside. Bernie Madoff was just one of thousands of financial fraudsters that was operating in this industry. The only reason he is well known (and in prison) but not people like Les Wexner, Mort Zuckerman, Leon Black etc is because he defrauded his fellow Jews, not because his crimes were particularly brazen.19:45 - oy vey
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/aThe second contribution of this paper has been to report on the first empirical study testing the three main hypotheses. They have been successfully tested in a real world setting of borrowing from a bank and examining the actual internal bank accounting in an uncontrolled real world environment.
It was examined whether in the process of making money available to the borrower the bank transfers these funds from other accounts (within or outside the bank). In the process of making loaned money available in the borrower's bank account, it was found that the bank did not transfer the money away from other internal or external accounts, resulting in a rejection of both the fractional reserve theory and the financial intermediation theory. Instead, it was found that the bank newly ‘invented’ the funds by crediting the borrower's account with a deposit, although no such deposit had taken place. This is in line with the claims of the credit creation theory.
Thus it can now be said with confidence for the first time – possibly in the 5000 years' history of banking - that it has been empirically demonstrated that each individual bank creates credit and money out of nothing, when it extends what is called a ‘bank loan’. The bank does not loan any existing money, but instead creates new money. The money supply is created as ‘fairy dust’ produced by the banks out of thin air.32 The implications are far-reaching.Powered by Sviesta Ciba