|
|||||||
Dunduka ciba No manis, protams, jurists ir tāds pats kā dziedātājs, tomēr reizēm šo to palasu. Nupat trāpījās labs piemērs apvainošanās kultūras un (konkrētas) reliģijas aizstāvēšanai tiesu praksē. Īpaši sajūsmina Austrijas apelācijas tiesas loģika 17.punktā: "It concluded that the latter was the case as Muslims would find the applicant’s statements – “he liked to do it with children”, “the thing with Aisha and child sex” and “a 56-year-old and a six-year-old? What do you call that? Give me an example? What do we call it, if it is not paedophilia?” – wrong and offensive, even if Muhammad had married a six-year-old and had intercourse with her when she had been nine." |
|||||||