D[ra]kone - Post a comment

"Christians make no attempt to refute it, it will destroy itself, and possibly its antireligious philosophical predecessors such as Sartrian existentialism, logical positivism, and Wittgensteinianism. This self-destruction will occur despite the efforts of Richard Rorty, postmodernism’s most gifted defender, who may ultimately do more to destroy the movement that to defend it."

http://www.leaderu.com/aip/docs/geuras.html

Diemžēl man pašu Rortiju izburt cauri momentā nav iespējams, tāpēc aprobežojos ar to, ko saka kritiķi. Lasīju arī ka viņš vispār tiek kritizēts par savu attieksmi pret patiesības izzināšanu:

"As we have seen in connection with Rorty's attitude to science, it is particularly Rorty's treatment of truth and knowledge that has drawn fire from philosophers. While a great variety of philosophers have criticized Rorty on this general score in a great variety of ways, it is not very difficult to discern a common concern; Rorty's conversationalist view of truth and knowledge leaves us entirely unable to account for the notion that a reasonable view of how things are is a view suitably constrained by how the world actually is."

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rorty/#4

Iepriekšējais citāts ir no:
http://webpages.ursinus.edu/rrichter/rortyone.html

Patiesība tam fruktam ir arī mājaslapa ... bet tas laikam tev nav jaunums ...

http://www.stanford.edu/~rrorty/

Have fun.