per silentium ad as†ra mille - May 7th, 2011 [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
باب

[ userinfo | sc userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

May 7th, 2011

kot v sapogah, a côte de la France [May. 7th, 2011|05:35 am]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMQH5gQllYc
LinkLeave a comment

auseklītis astoņlapis [May. 7th, 2011|08:36 am]
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

Žagariņš rullē vēlreiz [May. 7th, 2011|11:28 am]
http://zagarins.net/Latvjuraksti/index.html
LinkLeave a comment

an unfair amount, peters [May. 7th, 2011|05:42 pm]
There will be no peace. At any given moment for the rest of our lifetimes, there will be multiple conflicts in mutating forms around the globe. Violent conflict will dominate the headlines, but cultural and economic struggles will be steadier and ultimately more decisive. The de facto role of the US armed forces will be to keep the world safe for our economy and open to our cultural assault. To those ends, we will do a fair amount of killing.

We are building an information-based military to do that killing. There will still be plenty of muscle power required, but much of our military art will consist in knowing more about the enemy than he knows about himself, manipulating data for effectiveness and efficiency, and denying similar advantages to our opponents. This will involve a good bit of technology, but the relevant systems will not be the budget vampires, such as manned bombers and attack submarines, that we continue to buy through inertia, emotional attachment, and the lobbying power of the defense industry. Our most important technologies will be those that support soldiers and Marines on the ground, that facilitate command decisions, and that enable us to kill accurately and survive amid clutter (such as multidimensional urban battlefields).

Yes, foreign cultures are reasserting their threatened identities--usually with marginal, if any, success--and yes, they are attempting to escape our influence. But American culture is infectious, a plague of pleasure, and you don't have to die of it to be hindered or crippled in your integrity or competitiveness. The very struggle of other cultures to resist American cultural intrusion fatefully diverts their energies from the pursuit of the future. We should not fear the advent of fundamentalist or rejectionist regimes. They are simply guaranteeing their peoples' failure, while further increasing our relative strength.

http://www.carlisle.army.mil/USAWC/parameters/Articles/97summer/peters.htm
LinkLeave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | May 7th, 2011 ]
[ go | Previous Day|Next Day ]