|
Jul. 19th, 2023|11:59 pm |
Thanks, appreciated!
Could we consider a) vaccinated as acting cautiously based on information provided by (generally) trusted authorities, and b) non-COV19-vaccinated as acting ultra-cautiously even if it goes against the consensus of authorities?
If so, the latter type have a personality trait of putting their lives at risk less often statistically. This, plus having temporary outcast status during pandemic provided they might have had significantly less contacts with the infected. It could impact the fact that the mortality rates are very similar for both types.
Your thoughts? |
|