|
May. 13th, 2022|05:21 pm |
How can an analysis of infection rates per vaccination status (that is per 100,000) be 'tufta'? If I analyse the trends, then I will see which group over the last few months has the highest infection rates (per 100,000).
For example, from the information I gave you for Weeks 17 and 18 (which I got from SPKC), can you tell me clearly and explicitly where I have gone wrong? After all, we have the total number for each group and the infected number per each group. Are you saying it is not possible to calculate the number/100,000 from this information?
Are you saying 699/542,293 is not 129/100,000? I mean I stand to be corrected, but that is what I get. |
|