| Immigrant digs |
Sep. 1st, 2016|05:52 pm |
I think I have a more sceptical view. I will try to order a few of my thoughts:
It is important to remember that the IMI (International Migration Initiative) is a Soros institution. So when we lift citations such as the following from the text, we need to remember what Uncle George actually wants:
"“we should also be supporting actors in the field proactively seeking to change the policies, rules, and regulations that govern migration.” [there are many more in this vein - this will do for now]
What does George advocate?
"First , the EU has to accept at least a million asylum-seekers annually for the foreseeable future. And, to do that, it must share the burden fairly — a principle that a qualified majority finally established at a Sept. 23 summit... Adequate financing is critical. The EU should provide 15,000 euros ($16,800) per asylum-seeker for each of the first two years to help cover housing, health-care and education costs — and to make accepting refugees more appealing to member states. It can raise these funds by issuing long-term bonds using its largely untapped AAA borrowing capacity... to absorb and integrate more than a million asylum seekers and migrants a year, the EU needs to mobilize the private sector — NGOs, church groups and businesses — to act as sponsors.”
Let us be clear: many of these migrants are economic migrants; therefore, there is absolutely no reason why Europe should accept George's demands.
As most people are aware of this, a battle for the hearts and minds of the population is required, so when we see the IMI declares as its aim "... (to) strengthen civil society interventions in international policy debates", I remember the (propaganda) videos of Soros beneficiaries such as Providus, and the editorial slant of Ijab's Satori articles (indeed ALL Satori articles on this theme).
When I see the IMI state that "IMI’s access to the Sutherland team’s discussions has allowed us to keep civil society partners up-to-date on the latest developments, in order to inform advocacy and campaigning strategies prior to the events and to plan follow up actions."
I am reminded thet this is the Mr Sutherland is the gent (UN special representative for migration and Mr Blacktrouser's boss) who said "The EU should "do its best to undermine" the "homogeneity" of its member states" [BBC]
This will do for now. Welcome your thoughts - it is not a conspiracy I am fully convinced by, but something smells wrong: in short, I feel the whiff of Soros-sponsored propaganda and I miss the mature worldly discussion of a phenomenon, which as you rightly point out, is, at some level, unavoidable and as old as humanity.
|
|