| |
[21. Nov 2025|08:16] |
Lai jums šodien jauka diena, mītus izplatošās, agresīvās tumsoņas!
Ar cieņu, fellow tumsoņa
P.S. ja nu kāds palaida garām definīciju: agresīvs tumsoņa = cilvēks, kurš uzskata, ka zinātne nesniedz atbildes uz pilnīgi visiem jautājumiem |
|
|
| |
[21. Nov 2025|17:51] |
Feynman highlighted that science cannot answer questions of value and purpose ("what would i want to happen?) but only address questions of "what will happen". He also pointed out that science doesn't provide instructions for using its discoveries for good or evil, that its power is neutral.
[agresīvs tumsoņa detected]
Einstein believed science is limited because it can not provide answers to questions morality, ethics and purpose; the scientific method can only explain how facts are related, not what 'should be'. He argued that while science provides the means to achieve ends, it can not create the ends or values themselves.
[agresīvs tumsoņa detected]
Sagan noted that science has limits, such as not being able to answer all questions, particularly those involving meaning, spirituality, or ultimate origins, which he felt science was not equipped to provide and should not be treated as an all-encompassing explanation for.
[agresīvs tumsoņa detected] |
|
|