Kāda aptauja

sestdien, 25.12.2004 @4:15 pm | x-ƒ (style)

Tie, kas zina pareizo atbildi, ir laipni lūgti piedalīties aptaujā.

Ir doma par kādas cibiņiem noderīgas WAP lapas izveidi (gan jau vēlāk pastāstīšu), taču, tā kā ar šo kādu laiku neesmu nodarbojies, tad izrādās, ka šis tas ir diezgan ļoti mainījies. Tātad – vispirms citāts no Wired WebMonkey (by Heidi Pollock 5 Mar 2004), pēc tam aptauja.

Hoop Two: Protocol

The protocol hoop basically comes down to WAP versus HTTP. If you want to reach every single wireless user, you have to code an entirely separate version of your site in WML. WML is a more compact language, and WAP is a faster protocol than HTTP, so you may decide there are benefits to developing a WML version of your site. That said, even though many devices (usually older cell phones) run only WAP/WML browsers, most devices capable of receiving HTML usually have the capacity to support WML as well. Furthermore, the Open Mobile Alliance (formerly wapforum.org) is pushing XHTML now instead of WML, so even if WAP 2.0 gains favor as the wireless protocol of choice, the preferred coding language will be XHTML.

Confused yet? At great personal risk to my inbox, which will likely receive tons of hate mail now, this is my one sentence summation: code in HTML, not WML, and follow the very few basic rules to make your HTML XHTML-compatible.

Kļūdas nepiedod abi standarti, taču skaidrs, ka daudz vieglāk, patīkamāk un smukāk (var arī ar CSS) būtu izmantot XHTML-MP, taču arī tam ir trūkumi. Tad.. Ko labāk?

Poll #5457 techno :)
Open to: All, results viewable to: All

Tavuprāt, labāk būtu izmantot..

Sava pieredze, sakarīgi iebildumi un vienkārši piezīmes pie šī visa ir ļoti vēlams ierakstīt komentāros.