- 2.11.21 22:49
-
Par pašaizsardzības paņēmienu efektivitāti un pielāgojamību arī derētu plašā statistiskā aina, uz kuras pamata cilvēki arī pieņem izvēles vakcinēties vai nē:
"The second major misconception is the idea that, even if the vaccines don’t stop viral spread, everyone can derive statistically meaningful benefit from vaccination against COVID-19. As has been thoroughly demonstrated, SARS-CoV-2 is not an equal opportunity virus. Ninety-five percent of U.S. COVID-19 deaths have been among people 50 or older, and nearly 80% of deaths occurred in people 65 or older. About 78% of people in the United States who were hospitalized for COVID-19 were overweight or obese. A study of hospitalized COVID-19 patients found that 94.9% of them had one or more underlying conditions. For people between 0 and 19 years old, the infection survival rate is 99.9973%. The cost-benefit analysis for vaccinating a diabetic 75-year-old is therefore quite different from the cost-benefit analysis for vaccinating a 12-year-old. Because natural immunity appears to be robust and the COVID-19 vaccines do not eliminate transmission, many of those who make the personal choice to forgo vaccination are in fact making a decision that is no less rational or science-based than those who want the vaccine." (https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/plague-poor-gutentag)
Gana šī patosa. Sastiķētās potes nav nekāda tuksnesī uzslietā vara čūska, uz ko klaiņojošajiem un čūsku sakostajiem israēliešiem palūkoties un tapt veseliem. Drīzāk veids, kādā sekularizēti mesiānisku cerību apdvestie tās uzlūko un spiež mīlēt vienam otru atstāj iespaidu par kārtējo zelta teļu, tikai šajā gadījumā vēl kaunina ar pilnīgi nekaunīgu morālo patosu par to, ka neiet klanīties zelta teļa priekšā. Kam ausīs dzirdēt, tas lai dzird.