- 2.11.21 22:49
-
Man savukārt personīgu nelabumu uzdzen hipermoralizētāji, kuri rullē cauri ziņu lentei, lai speciāli uzdurtos tieši tai speciālai biedināšanai (project FEAR) atlasītajai ziņai par kādu slimu zīdaini vai grūtnieci, bet ignorēs kopējo statistiku. Tādēļ man likumsakarīgi rodas jautājums - kurš atbildēs par šo lielāko public health fiasko pasaules vēsturē?
"In April, during a White House press briefing barely four months after distribution of the first vaccine doses began, Walensky announced that the “CDC recommends that pregnant people receive the COVID-19 vaccine.” But if you checked the CDC website that day—as many pregnant women and their physicians of course did—you would have found something different: “If you are pregnant, you may choose to receive a COVID-19 vaccine,” but “there are currently limited data on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant people.” In the press briefing, Walensky had cited a study from the New England Journal of Medicine, about which she said: “no safety concerns were observed for people vaccinated in the third trimester or safety concerns for their babies.”
The study did claim that there was no increased instance of fetal death or neonatal death, which was very reassuring. But it was unable to answer one of the main questions many pregnant women are concerned about: Will these new vaccines have adverse effects on my baby’s development after birth? The study’s authors made clear that they didn’t have enough longitudinal data on women in the first or second trimester of pregnancy to draw conclusions about women vaccinated in those two trimesters (when different organ systems develop), and that their study was therefore “preliminary”: “Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes” (emphasis added).
Recall that the vaccine rollout began in December 2020, for older people. This study only looked at safety data on women in various stages of pregnancy from Dec. 14, 2020, to Feb. 28, 2021, a two-and-a-half-month period. Many women become more vigilant in pregnancy about what they eat, and what they put into their bodies. So it should come as no surprise that more than one woman who was either pregnant or trying to conceive began wondering about a question that one of my colleagues asked me: If at the time of the study, the vaccine had only been available for two-and-a-half months, wouldn’t that mean—if it’s still true that human gestation is approximately nine months—that literally no one who had been vaccinated early in pregnancy had yet followed through to a full-term pregnancy?" (https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/science/articles/needle-points-vaccinations-c hapter-three)
Dīvaini izlikties, ka Covid vakcīnas "darbojas tāpat kā visas citas", ja reiz paši ražotāji neskaitāmas reizes ir uzsvēruši "jauno mRns tehnoloģiju", kas darbojas citādāk nekā standarta vakcīnas un faktu, ka vēl nekad pasaules vēsturē tik ātri nav izstrādātas kādas potes.