hot_space's Journal

dzejolis par ekonomikas teoriju
lūk, entuziasts ir izvēlējies dzejoļa formu savas domas paušanai. ar to viņš piedalās diskusijā par neo-klasiskās ekonomikas paradigmas dominējošo ietekmi un alternatīvu skatpunktu ierobežotās iespējas tiks saklausītiem.

viņa ievads:

as a marxist i have been on the receiving end
of the attack i'm about to launch at the neo classical paradigm

nosaukums (presumably):

it can't be refuted

dzejolis:

and of course dear tombo here
is trying to say alternative formalisms
might be more fruitful
i doubt a scrap job
is worth it
why lose the practical value of a a shared formalism
for the field
just to make a class view point
a little reconstruction
of the present paradigm
labels ,distinctions etc
can yield this ...if wanted

the paradigm per se
like any paradigm
no content
its an instrumentality
and until that instrumentality
collapses under its own conflicting "results "

---and it hasn't ---

or runs up against a reality it dare no longer ignore or assume away

-- it has (the great depression) ---

it can't reform itself to deal with effectively

---- god bless keynes ---

it will serve

---at least to the extent it's seen as such ..a shared formalism and not reified -----
------

it's
a dynamic evolving but by necessity
radically incomplete set
of theorems and the assumptions
they require
and more centrally as a science
the various conflicting interpretations
of these formalisms

the great leap from analytics to abduction
ie to "model" claims

taken as a totality
these formalisms
are often obviously mutually contradictory
of course they are
the field develops thru the eruption
of inconsistent conclusions
as much as model failure

big deal what's new here