| |
[Nov. 29th, 2007|01:32 pm] |
|
|
|
|
| Comments: |
| From: | jude |
| Date: | November 29th, 2007 - 02:02 pm |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
Skaidrs bija tas, ka neskatoties uz to, ka visiem kas tur strādā ir zināms, ka viņš NEatbilst Satversmes 3.pantam, tiesa tik un tā to atzīs par atbilstošu.
![[User Picture]](http://klab.lv/userpic/29025/768) | | From: | fleur |
| Date: | November 29th, 2007 - 02:05 pm |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
kāpēc tad atzina paar atbilstošu, ja tur visiem ir skaidrs, ka neatbilst?
| From: | jude |
| Date: | November 29th, 2007 - 02:06 pm |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
to Tu man neprasi. acīmredzot - pērkamai valstij pērkama tiesa (c)
![[User Picture]](http://klab.lv/userpic/29025/768) | | From: | fleur |
| Date: | November 29th, 2007 - 02:11 pm |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
Man šķita, ja jau tu zini a, tas zini ari b.
![[User Picture]](http://klab.lv/userpic/29025/768) | | From: | fleur |
| Date: | November 29th, 2007 - 02:11 pm |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
tad | |