crush [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
esplanade

[ userinfo | sc userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Sam Harris, b. 1967, not that weary of this particular topic [Jul. 17th, 2016|09:45 pm]

Mr. Harris: This drug had been advertised to us as something that can reveal something about the nature of human mind. And it was exactly what we experienced. For those who has taken MDMA, it won't be a surprise. There was no psychedelic component in it, no change in visual properties, or anything. What there was, was just a feeling of dropping away of self-concern. That was totally liberating. I'd never realised that I was carrying around this burden of self. To the degree that I was. When talking to somebody, the part of my attention was bound up in worrying about what they thought of me. I wasn't just seeing the other person, I was triangulating on myself, through their eyes. Modifying how I felt about myself.
And so I was sitting there with a very close friend at that time and I didn't even noticed that drop-away at that moment. I kind of retrospectively realised: Oh, My - this thing is gone! This monster of me, which has been behind my face, is gone! And I'm just free to realise that I love and wish nothing but happiness to the person, I'm sitting with. For that MDMA experience Love is the main epiphany. Love is a state of being, which entails just being deeply commited to the happiness of other beings. Whether you know them or not.
The epiphany that really anchored that to me and how I realised, that something unusual had happened to my mind, was that I was sitting, again, with my best friend at that time, and realising how much I love this guy. And we both were teenage, heterosexual men, who even hadn't thought in those terms - loving your male friends. I don't think I'd ever hugged a male friend before that point in my life. There was just this outpouring love to the friend of mine. And then I realised that if a stranger had walked into that room, I had loved that stranger, too.
linkpost comment

Karl Ove Knausgård, b.1968, on book tour [Apr. 29th, 2016|05:21 pm]
Mr. Knausgård: "That's the only way to have a relationship, really. If you don't lie, it will collapse. "
linkpost comment

Andrew Sullivan (b. 1963), breaking ground in his thirties [Apr. 15th, 2016|01:22 pm]

Mr. Sullivan 
link2 comments|post comment

Ryan Steele (as Chip) b.1990 [Apr. 10th, 2016|06:59 pm]

A pass by remark: "They are not your friends. They're just people you happen to know now."
linkpost comment

Judith Butler, b. 1956 (could be my dad) [Mar. 18th, 2016|02:53 am]
Ms. Butler: "It happened last year, some time, I come to door, and there is this man and he says: "excuse me, Mister..., Madam..., Mister, Madam..." 
He couldn't get through it. 
I kinda leaned forward and asked "is it really important to determine my gender in order to check minibar?" 
Of course, I humiliated him and immediately felt really bad. And this was also a class moment, and I was not sensitive to that. He's a worker, he doesn't know, what to do with people like me. 
And then he said: "of  course, not, Mister..., Madam..., Mister..., Madam."
And then, the next day, I go to the pool. The same hotel. I then was in the ladies' locker room changing and a young woman comes in and says: "Oh, oh, do the ladies and the blokes change together?" 
"No, no, I don't think so. This IS for the ladies," I said. 
And she said: "Oh, sorry, sorry, I was so confused!"
Then I leaned forward, making up from my sin of the previous day and I said: "I am a lady."
Which is the first time in my life that I ever said it."
link1 comment|post comment

Oscar Parviainen (1880-1938), Self-portrait, 1914 [Jan. 10th, 2016|04:59 pm]
Just a random Sunday crush (the image that appeared for no longer than a second in documentary about Sibelius.)
link1 comment|post comment

Andy Warhol (1928-1987), kaut kas no Nastavševa, ne. [Sep. 29th, 2015|12:41 am]

Mr. Warhol: "Dying is the most embarrassing thing that can ever happen to you. Because someone has got to care of all your details. You've died and someone has got to take care of your body, make the funeral arrangements, pick out the casket and the service, and the cemetery, and the clothes for you to wear, and get someone to style you and do the make-up. You'd like to help them. And most of all you'd like to do the whole thing yourself. But your're dead, so you can't. Here you spend your whole life trying to make enough money to take care of yourself, so you won't bother anyone else with your problems. And then you wind up dumping the biggest problem ever in somebody else's lap. It's a shame. I never understood why when you died, you didn't just vanish, and everything could just keep going as it was. Only you just won't be there."
link1 comment|post comment

Richard Rorty (1931-2007), comforting himself with verse in his late years [Sep. 10th, 2015|10:24 pm]

Mr. Rorty: "I can still remember things, that I have done to other people 30 or 40 years ago. That emotions of shame and guilt are so intense, that I instantly try to distrack my attention. It isn't like I remember inflicting deliberate pain on anybody, it's just acts of omission: it would have been so easy to have done something for her or it would have been so easy to be kind, but I wasn't. Something like that."
linkpost comment

James Baldwin (1924-1987), in Saint-Paul-de-Vence [Aug. 5th, 2015|08:08 pm]
Mr. Baldwin: "You probably can't laugh if you can't suffer. I think, the joy and the suffering are intertwined somehow. As long as you're able to feel you're certainly gonna suffer. But that isn't all. If you can love, for example, you're gonna suffer, but you're gonna laugh."
linkpost comment

братья Дзядко, Тихон, Тимофей и Филипп [Apr. 20th, 2015|02:08 pm]
linkpost comment

Gore Vidal (1925-2012) in his Holywood years [Jan. 14th, 2015|06:16 pm]
Mr. Vidal: "we had the saying at MGM that the power man, the commander of movie, was the producer. The pretty man was the star, the creative man was the writer, and the director was a brother-in-law - usually of some high ranking official at the studio. [..] The writers were pretty cynical about the directors, and the writers outranked the directors until the 50's. They've got paid more, generally, "
linkpost comment

Sandra Brigitte Toksvig, b.1958 [Dec. 24th, 2014|09:34 am]

Akkungs, cik viņa skaisti smejas, iemīlēties var.
linkpost comment

Frank Leder, Berlin, 2014 [Oct. 31st, 2014|04:41 pm]

Attēlam šajā izlasē gan ir viens būtisks trūkums, tā varonis ir dzīvs un netālu, tāpēc bīstams.
linkpost comment

Wilfred Owen, 1917 [Oct. 1st, 2014|02:54 pm]

In July 1918, Owen returned to active service in France, although he might have stayed on home-duty indefinitely. Owen was killed in action on 4 November 1918 (at the age of 25) during the crossing of the Sambre–Oise Canal, exactly one week (almost to the hour) before the signing of the Armistice.
linkpost comment

Christofer Isherwood before moving to Berlin, 1930 [Sep. 22nd, 2014|10:31 pm]

Mr. Isherwood: "So there you are. Probably you are amused, possibly you are irritated, you think I'm not serious. I hardly know what to add by way of expression. There are plenty of people, who would admire the noble ruins of Antiquity, the glory that was Greece and the grandeur that was Rome. I, it seems, belong to a tiny, perverse minority, who prefer ignoble ruins of the day before yesterday."
linkpost comment

Walter Gropius, a student, 1900s [Sep. 21st, 2014|11:39 pm]

Pre-Bauhaus, pre-WWI, pre-Alma Mahler
linkpost comment

Glenn Gould & Leonard Bernstein, New York, April 6, 1962 [Sep. 21st, 2014|09:42 pm]
Mr. Bernstein: "Don't be frightened. Mr. Gould is here. He will appear in a moment. I'm not, um, as you know, in the habit of speaking on any concert except the Thursday night previews, but a curious situation has arisen, which merits, I think, a word or two. You are about to hear a rather, shall we say, unorthodox performance of the Brahms D Minor Concerto, a performance distinctly different from any I've ever heard, or even dreamt of for that matter, in its remarkably broad tempi and its frequent departures from Brahms' dynamic indications. I cannot say I am in total agreement with Mr. Gould's conception and this raises the interesting question: "What am I doing conducting it?" I'm conducting it because Mr. Gould is so valid and serious an artist that I must take seriously anything he conceives in good faith and his conception is interesting enough so that I feel you should hear it, too. But the age old question still remains: "In a concerto, who is the boss; the soloist or the conductor?" The answer is, of course, sometimes one, sometimes the other, depending on the people involved. But almost always, the two manage to get together by persuasion or charm or even threats to achieve a unified performance. I have only once before in my life had to submit to a soloist's wholly new and incompatible concept and that was the last time I accompanied Mr. Gould. (The audience roared with laughter at this.) But, but this time the discrepancies between our views are so great that I feel I must make this small disclaimer. Then why, to repeat the question, am I conducting it? Why do I not make a minor scandal — get a substitute soloist, or let an assistant conduct? Because I am fascinated, glad to have the chance for a new look at this much-played work; Because, what's more, there are moments in Mr. Gould's performance that emerge with astonishing freshness and conviction. Thirdly, because we can all learn something from this extraordinary artist, who is a thinking performer, and finally because there is in music what Dimitri Mitropoulos used to call "the sportive element", that factor of curiosity, adventure, experiment, and I can assure you that it has been an adventure this week collaborating with Mr. Gould on this Brahms concerto and it's in this spirit of adventure that we now present it to you."
linkpost comment

navigation
[ viewing | 20 entries back ]
[ go | later ]