|
26. Jul 2025|13:36 |
Bet protams, ja kārtīgi paurbina degunu, stabila preference kļūst ļoti 'problemātiska'
Fragments no raksta uz kuru ir atsauce:
The difficulties I have been discussing are currently posed in the most vexed form within feminism by the experience of trans women. Trans women often face sexual exclusion from lesbian cis women who at the same time claim to take them seriously as women. This phenomenon was named the ‘cotton ceiling’ [..]
The phenomenon is real, but, as many trans women have noted, the phrase itself is unfortunate. While the ‘glass ceiling’ implies the violation of a woman’s right to advance on the basis of her work, the ‘cotton ceiling’ describes a lack of access to what no one is obligated to give [..]
Yet simply to say to a trans woman, or a disabled woman, or an Asian man, ‘No one is required to have sex with you,’ is to skate over something crucial. There is no entitlement to sex, and everyone is entitled to want what they want, but personal preferences – no dicks, no fems, no fats, no blacks, no arabs, no rice no spice, masc-for-masc – are never just personal.
Tātad, ja tevi romantiski interesē tikai sievietes, tas nozīmē no dicks - kāpēc tu esi tik 'apsēsts ar ğenitālijām'? Ja no blacks - nu tad tu vienk esi 'rasists' etc. |
|