| |
[7. Okt 2025|10:49] |
Pārlasu Kamillu Pagliju. Reku teksts, kurš ārkārtīgi patiks feministēm:
"Men must struggle for identity against the overwhelming power of their mothers. Women have menstruation to tell them they are women. Men must do or risk something to be men. Men become masculine only when other men say they are. Having sex with a woman is one way a boy becomes a man.
College men are at their hormonal peak. They have just left their mothers and are questing for their male identity. In groups, they are dangerous. A woman going to a fraternity party is walking into Testosterone Flats, full of prickly cacti and blazing guns. If she goes, she should be armed with resolute alertness. She should arrive with girlfriends and leave with them. A girl who lets herself get dead drunk at a fraternity party is a fool. A girl who goes upstairs with a brother at fraternity party is an idiot. Feminists call this "blaming the victim." I call it common sense."
Ir lietas, kuras ir jāmāca vīriešiem, par to nav šaubu, bet ko ir jāmāca meitenēm? Ja meitene aiziet un piedzeras, pamostas atskurbumā vietā, kur viņa nekādā gadījumā negribētu būt, visa sabiedrība ir dziļi šokēta. Vai mums ir jāsaka: meitiņ, ej droši dzert ar tipiem, kuriem tu pilnībā neuzticies vai kuru reputācija bieži vien iet viņiem pa priekšu, jo pēc likuma viņi tev neko nevar nodarīt, just go ahead, have fun. Tas būtu kā mācīt iet droši pie gājēju pārejas jebkuros apstākļos, jo pēc likuma transportam cilvēkus uz pārejas ir jāpalaiž. Bet tas nav tas, kā mēs mācām, mēs vienalga liekam būt uzmanīgiem pie pārejas, jo tuvumā var gadīties kādi, kas pārkāpj noteikumus. Tāpēc labāk uzmanies un nekāp uz pārejas, ja situācija ir bīstama, nevis pēc tam guli slimnīcā ar lauztām ribām un apziņu, ka "taisnība ir tavā pusē". Tāpat arī - tu vari iet un dzert cik vēlies ar jebkuru kompāniju, tikai tev ir jāsaprot, ka arī tas notiek uz tavu atbildību, tev ir jāizvērtē situācija un jāapzinās, ka tu uzņemies risku. |
|
|
| jāpajautā Ilutai: krievijas propaganda vai nav lasījušas dokumentus? |
[7. Okt 2025|16:24] |
https://brusselssignal.eu/2025/10/the-meaning-of-woman-has-been-eroded-in-europes-gender-policies/
Produced with support from the UK campaign group Sex Matters, the report calls for “clarity, evidence and democratic accountability” in European policymaking.
It warns that a marked ideological shift has taken hold within Europe’s institutions, mirrored in the changing language, priorities and culture of policymaking.
Athena Forum’s founder and director Faika El-Nagashi, a former Austrian MP, and co-author Anna Zobnina, a feminist policy specialist, say gender identity frameworks have been integrated into European Union and Council of Europe (CoE) policies largely “behind closed doors”.
They contend that new norms are being introduced through “soft law” instruments such as guidelines, strategies and recommendations, rather than through open legislative debate. [..]
The report traces the spread of gender identity language from the Yogyakarta Principles of 2006 – a non-binding international framework on sexual orientation and gender identity – to European human-rights and equality mechanisms.
It highlights the role of the EU Fundamental Rights Agency, the European Institute for Gender Equality and the Council of Europe’s SOGIESC Unit in embedding these definitions into policy and professional training.
Groups receive tens of millions of euros in funding from EU programmes, philanthropic foundations and international donors. |
|
|