| |
[23. Jul 2025|16:35] |
"Not all Muslims are Islamists. Not all believers wish to impose their theology on others. Of course. But neither are all white people racists, and yet no progressive chokes on the phrase “white supremacy.” So why the hesitation, the euphemisms, the cowardice, when the subject turns to political Islam?
Why must we say “religiously motivated extremism” instead of naming the doctrine that inspired the bomb? Why do we hear of “Asian grooming gangs” instead of “Pakistani Muslim sex trafficking rings”? Why do we refer to the Maldives as a “challenging democracy” rather than a theocratic prison with coral beaches?
Because the liberal West, having abolished blasphemy laws, is now enforcing them in reverse. The new heresy is criticism of faith—at least of one faith. To mock Christianity is edgy. To mock Islam is hate speech. To question Jewish nationalism is principled resistance. To question Islamist imperialism is bigotry.
It is not diversity. It is doublethink. It is a sacred exception carved out in the name of peace, which is to say, in the name of fear.
And let us not mince words: fear is the root of all this. Fear of riots, fatwas, hashtags, and funding withdrawals. Fear of being labeled “Islamophobic,” a term so intellectually bankrupt it’s used to equate actual bigotry with factual description. “Islamophobia” has become the blasphemy charge of secular societies. And like all blasphemy laws, it is designed not to protect the believer, but to silence the critic."
https://pfriesen.substack.com/p/the-crescent-and-the-guillotine |
|
|
| |
[23. Jul 2025|18:53] |
|
Ja man būtu tik daudz naudas, ka es varētu dzīvot jebkur, kur vien vēlos, tad es dzīvotu Jūrkalnē. |
|
|