|
[Dec. 13th, 2005|06:11 pm] |
|
|
|
Comments: |
| From: | ref |
Date: | March 8th, 2006 - 10:28 am |
---|
| | | (Link) |
|
nu ja, ka te ir nekorekta apaljoshana, jo lai vai cik 9 buutu aiz komata pasham a, skaitlim 10a deviitnieku skaits buus par 1 mazaaks jo peedeejais buus 8. liidz ar to no 10a atnjemot a ieguusim nevis 90 bet gan 89.9999...998
arii 10a-a = 90 neiztur paarbaudi jo, 10a-a = 9a. un 9a ir vienaads ar 9*9.999... , kas nekad nebuus pilns 90, bet gan jau mineetais 89.9999...998
| From: | ref |
Date: | March 8th, 2006 - 10:31 am |
---|
| | | (Link) |
|
uj kljuuda tajaa niansee, ka peedeejais cipars nevis 8, bet gan 1. savaadaak man liekas visu pareizi pateicu :) | |