Atradu un izlasīju interesantu grāmatu: "Sociālisma fenomens",izdota Francijā ~1975.gadā, autors PSRS laika disidents, A.Saharova līdzgaitnieks I. Šafarevičs( : https://secure.wikimedia.org/w ikipedia/en/wiki/Igor_Shafarevich). Tajā viņš argumentēti pamato ka sociālisma pamatidejas eksistē un tikušas realizētas praksē jau kopš sirmas senatnes(piemēram Inku valsts, senā Ēģipte) un ka tas pēc būtības ir nāves kults. Kopumā pārliecinoši. Drukāta versija ir retums, bet ir pieejama arī tīmeklī http://robertlstephens.com/essays/shafa revich/001SocialistPhenomenon.html Droši vien eksistē versijas arī krievu valodā.
No Solžeņicina ievada grāmatai: Socialism seeks to reduce human personality to its most primitive levels and to extinguish the highest, most complex, and "God-like" aspects of human individuality. And even equality itself, that powerful appeal and great promise of socialists throughout the ages, turns out to signify not equality of rights, of opportunities, and of external conditions, but equality qua identity, equality seen as the movement of variety toward uniformity.
Even though, as this book shows, socialism has always successfully avoided truly scientific analyses of its essence, Shafarevich's study challenges present-day theoreticians of socialism to demonstrate their arguments in a businesslike public discussion.
No Solžeņicina ievada grāmatai: Socialism seeks to reduce human personality to its most primitive levels and to extinguish the highest, most complex, and "God-like" aspects of human individuality. And even equality itself, that powerful appeal and great promise of socialists throughout the ages, turns out to signify not equality of rights, of opportunities, and of external conditions, but equality qua identity, equality seen as the movement of variety toward uniformity.
Even though, as this book shows, socialism has always successfully avoided truly scientific analyses of its essence, Shafarevich's study challenges present-day theoreticians of socialism to demonstrate their arguments in a businesslike public discussion.