Slashdot's Journal
[Most Recent Entries]
[Calendar View]
[Friends]
Below are 20 journal entries, after skipping by the 40 most recent ones recorded in
Slashdot's LiveJournal:
[ << Previous 20 -- Next 20 >> ]
| Friday, January 3rd, 2014 | | 7:05 am |
Searching the Internet For Evidence of Time Travelers http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/PJPrKvZUEmA/story01.htm http://slashdot.feedsportal.com/c/35028/f/647410/s/3572cfd4/sc/4/l/0Lidle0Bslashdot0Borg0Cstory0C140C0A10C0A20C23582480Csearching0Ethe0Einternet0Efor0Eevidence0Eof0Etime0Etravelers0Dutm0Isource0Frss10B0Amainlinkanon0Gutm0Imedium0Ffeed/story01.htm Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "Here's an interesting paper by two physicists at Michigan Technological University who have come up with a practical methodology for finding time travelers through the internet. 'Time travel has captured the public imagination for much of the past century, but little has been done to actually search for time travelers. Here, three implementations of Internet searches for time travelers are described, all seeking a prescient mention of information not previously available. The first search covered prescient content placed on the Internet, highlighted by a comprehensive search for specific terms in tweets on Twitter. The second search examined prescient inquiries submitted to a search engine, highlighted by a comprehensive search for specific search terms submitted to a popular astronomy web site. The third search involved a request for a direct Internet communication, either by email or tweet, pre-dating to the time of the inquiry. Given practical verifiability concerns, only time travelers from the future were investigated. No time travelers were discovered. Although these negative results do not disprove time travel, given the great reach of the Internet, this search is perhaps the most comprehensive to date.' Steven Hawkings' similar search (video) also provided negative results." Read more of this story at Slashdot.       | | 4:00 am |
| | 1:12 am |
There's Kanye West-Themed Crypto-Currency On the Way http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/aFwWGNMzN1M/story01.htm http://slashdot.feedsportal.com/c/35028/f/647410/s/35712047/sc/4/l/0Lidle0Bslashdot0Borg0Cstory0C140C0A10C0A20C23392480Ctheres0Ekanye0Ewest0Ethemed0Ecrypto0Ecurrency0Eon0Ethe0Eway0Dutm0Isource0Frss10B0Amainlinkanon0Gutm0Imedium0Ffeed/story01.htm Nerval's Lobster writes "A bunch of anonymous developers are working on 'Coinye West,' a crypto-currency named after rapper Kanye West. Coinye West isn't an official production of Kanye West, and the developers are staying anonymous because they probably fear the inevitable copyright lawsuits. (Of course, if the currency hits the online market and proves a success, it's always possible the real Kanye West would drop any suit in exchange for a massive amount of Coinye West coins—every hip-hop artist on the planet might claim to drive a Maybach, but how many can claim a currency?) 'DROPPING JANUARY 11, 2014. 11 PM EST,' read a note on Coinyewest.com. 'No premine, no screwed up fake "fair" launches, shyster devs, muted channels, and f**ked up wallets,' it helpfully added. 'We will be releasing password protected, encrypted archives containing binaries and source for the wallet and daemon BEFORE LAUNCH, with the passwords to be released at the specified time.' Just to emphasize the supposed fairness of this particular crypto-currency, the note repeated: 'We will work with multiple pools to orchestrate a PROPER and FAIR release.' A chat room is available at irc.freenode.net. Technical details for the crypto-currency include: Algorithm: Scrypt; max Coins: 133,333,333,333; block time: 90 seconds; difficulty Re-Target Time: 12 hours; block Rewards: 666,666 COYE; every 100k blocks, the payout halves. In the future, will every major celebrity will have a crypto-currency named after him or her? And how long until Jay-Z decides to launch something similar?" Read more of this story at Slashdot.       | | 12:23 am |
| | Thursday, January 2nd, 2014 | | 11:35 pm |
| | 11:14 pm |
| | 10:50 pm |
| | 10:07 pm |
| | 9:14 pm |
| | 8:32 pm |
| | 7:49 pm |
| | 6:40 pm |
| | 7:22 pm |
| | 5:59 pm |
| | 5:16 pm |
| | 4:57 pm |
| | 4:35 pm |
Five Alternatives To Snapchat http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/mSvKe7rgtY0/story01.htm http://slashdot.feedsportal.com/c/35028/f/647410/s/356e7799/sc/4/l/0Lyro0Bslashdot0Borg0Cstory0C140C0A10C0A20C14282550Cfive0Ealternatives0Eto0Esnapchat0Dutm0Isource0Frss10B0Amainlinkanon0Gutm0Imedium0Ffeed/story01.htm Nerval's Lobster writes "Snapchat isn't having the best 2014: less than a week after a cyber-security collective revealed an exploit that could allow hackers to swipe users' personal data from the messaging service, a couple hackers reportedly went right ahead and stole 4.6 million usernames and phone numbers, posting them as a downloadable database. It's easy to see why Snapchat's become so popular: the idea of messages that vaporize within a few seconds of opening holds a lot of appeal to not only the excessively paranoid, but also anyone who simply wants to keep their online footprint to a minimum. But as several security experts are pointing out, the idea of 'disappearing messages' was never a foolproof one. 'If you took a photo of your phone while the risky image was on screen, or took a screenshot, or dumped your phone's graphics RAM, or used basic forensic data recovery techniques to retrieve the "deleted" files after viewing them, or fetched the image through a session-logging web proxy,' Phil Ducklin wrote in a Jan. 1 posting on the Naked Security Website, 'then you'd quickly have realised that Snapchat's promises of "disappearing images" were fanciful.' For those who no longer trust Snapchat, but want that same vaporizing-message functionality, some alternatives exist, including Silent Circle (which offers a messaging app, for a subscription fee, that forces messages to self-destruct after a set period of time) and Wickr (features military-grade encryption — AES256, ECDH521, RSA4096, TLS — and the app-builders claim they don't have the keys to decrypt; messages vaporize after a set time)." Read more of this story at Slashdot.       | | 3:53 pm |
| | 3:11 pm |
| | 2:30 pm |
|
[ << Previous 20 -- Next 20 >> ]
|