Slashdot's Journal
[Most Recent Entries]
[Calendar View]
[Friends]
Below are 20 journal entries, after skipping by the 240 most recent ones recorded in
Slashdot's LiveJournal:
[ << Previous 20 -- Next 20 >> ]
| Monday, December 23rd, 2013 | | 7:17 pm |
| | 6:49 pm |
Mikhail Kalashnikov: Inventor of AK-47 Dies At 94 http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/AOVlNA8YA5Y/story01.htm http://slashdot.feedsportal.com/c/35028/f/647410/s/3524f292/sc/24/l/0Ltech0Bslashdot0Borg0Cstory0C130C120C230C18212310Cmikhail0Ekalashnikov0Einventor0Eof0Eak0E470Edies0Eat0E940Dutm0Isource0Frss10B0Amainlinkanon0Gutm0Imedium0Ffeed/story01.htm necro81 writes "Lt. Gen. Mikhail T. Kalashnikov, an arms designer for the Soviet Union, creator of the AK-47, passed away today at age 94. Kalashnikov was born a peasant and entered the Soviet Army as a conscript. However, the self-taught tinkerer had an aptitude that took him far. The AK-47, his best-known creation, was praised for its reliability and low cost; attributes that have made it the most successful firearm ever, seeing use in homeland defense, rebellion, terrorism, and untold massacres. The inventor was himself ambivalent about the uses his creation had seen, but was nevertheless proud of his contribution to his country, where he is praised as a hero." Read more of this story at Slashdot.       | | 6:29 pm |
| | 5:42 pm |
| | 5:18 pm |
| | 4:55 pm |
| | 4:07 pm |
MIT Study: Only 3.1% of USA Used Electronics "e-Waste" Were Exported http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/BCop3nINleo/story01.htm http://slashdot.feedsportal.com/c/35028/f/647410/s/3523f3ff/sc/31/l/0Lnews0Bslashdot0Borg0Cstory0C130C120C230C15262270Cmit0Estudy0Eonly0E310Eof0Eusa0Eused0Eelectronics0Ee0Ewaste0Ewere0Eexported0Dutm0Isource0Frss10B0Amainlinkanon0Gutm0Imedium0Ffeed/story01.htm retroworks writes "The MIT Materials Systems Laboratory, EU's StEP, and the U.S. National Center for Electronics Recycling (NCER) have released a study, Quantitative Characterization of Domestic and Transboundary Flows of Used Electronics, that analyses collection and export of obsolete electronics generated in the United States. It is the fifth study to debunk a widely reported statistic that '80 percent' of used electronics are dumped abroad. Last year, the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) released studies of 279 sea containers, seized as 'e-waste' in African ports of Lagos and Accra, and found 91% of the goods were reused. According to the UN, most of the junk at Chinese and African dumps was generated in African cities (Lagos had 6.9M households with TV in 2007, World Bank). The UNEP study also bolsters African traders claims that used product purchased from nations with strong warranty laws outperform 'affordable' new product imported from Asia. Where did the 'original' widely reported statistic of 80% dumping (see /. slashdot dumping story) originate? Last May, in response to an editorial by Junkyard Planet author Adam Minter in Bloomberg, the source of dumping accusations (Basel Action Network) claimed 'never, ever' to have cited the statistic. The new studies have not slowed USA legislation aimed at banning trade of used electronics for repair, reuse and recycling overseas. This month, the Coalition for American Electronics Recycling (CAER.org) announced 13 republicans and 5 democrats had signed on to support the bill 2791 to criminalize exports of non-shredded displays, cell phones, and computers. Interpol announced a new 'Project Eden' targeting African geek importers in November 2013." In related news, First time accepted submitter Accordion Noir writes: "Virginia tech researchers and a team from the US, Canada, and Russia have released a study indicating that the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 may have had positive environmental results in fish. Reduced mercury releases from mining in areas effected by the economic disarray in Russia led fish to have lower levels of methyl mercury than those in rivers on the Norwegian border or in Canada, where mining continued." Read more of this story at Slashdot.       | | 4:55 pm |
| | 3:20 pm |
Member of President Obama's NSA Panel Recommends Increased Data Collection http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/NoDzG9NvGjc/story01.htm http://slashdot.feedsportal.com/c/35028/f/647410/s/35233b6d/sc/1/l/0Lyro0Bslashdot0Borg0Cstory0C130C120C230C13232120Cmember0Eof0Epresident0Eobamas0Ensa0Epanel0Erecommends0Eincreased0Edata0Ecollection0Dutm0Isource0Frss10B0Amainlinkanon0Gutm0Imedium0Ffeed/story01.htm cold fjord writes "National Journal reports, 'Michael Morell, the former acting director of the CIA and a member of President Obama's task force on surveillance, said ... that a controversial telephone data-collection program conducted by the National Security Agency should be expanded to include emails. He also said the program, far from being unnecessary, could prevent the next 9/11. Morell, seeking to correct any misperception that the presidential panel had called for a radical curtailment of NSA programs, said he is in favor of restarting a program that the NSA discontinued in 2011 that involved the collection of "meta-data" for internet communications. ... "I would argue actually that the email data is probably more valuable than the telephony data," ... Morell also said that while he agreed with the report's conclusion that the telephone data program, conducted under Section 215 of the Patriot Act, made "only a modest contribution to the nation's security" so far, it should be continued under the new safeguards recommended by the panel. "I would argue that what effectiveness we have seen to date is totally irrelevant to how effective it might be in the future," he said. "This program, 215, has the ability to stop the next 9/11 and if you added emails in there it would make it even more effective. Had it been in place in 2000 and 2001, I think that probably 9/11 would not have happened."' — More at Politico and National Review. Some members of Congress have a different view. Even Russian President Putin has weighed in with both a zing and a defense." Read more of this story at Slashdot.       | | 2:33 pm |
Why Snapchat and Its Ilk Face a Revenue Conundrum http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/Pkb3LC1NkfY/story01.htm http://slashdot.feedsportal.com/c/35028/f/647410/s/3522d805/sc/5/l/0Lnews0Bslashdot0Borg0Cstory0C130C120C230C13162330Cwhy0Esnapchat0Eand0Eits0Eilk0Eface0Ea0Erevenue0Econundrum0Dutm0Isource0Frss10B0Amainlinkanon0Gutm0Imedium0Ffeed/story01.htm Nerval's Lobster writes "Snapchat managed to attract a lot of buzz in 2013—perhaps more than any other app on the market—and it's easy to see why: in these paranoid times, with the NSA allegedly sniffing around the world's collective inbox, and lots of software on the market designed to snoop into people's lives, it's comforting to have an app that'll vaporize your messages within seconds of their opening. Snapchat's executives see the startup's future as so bright, in fact, that they reportedly turned down a $3 billion buyout from Facebook. But whether Snapchat eventually accepts a buyout offer, or tries to parlay its popularity into some sort of IPO, it faces a rather unique problem: how do you make money off a free app that near-instantly vaporizes all content? Snapchat could emulate enterprise-centric vaporizing-message firms such as Silent Circle and start charging for subscriptions, but that would probably kill the service; a multitude of free rivals would likely spring up, with the express purpose of stealing irate customers away. More likely, Snapchat will probably launch some sort of display ad system, similar to what Facebook and Twitter have now—but given how it doesn't store user information on its servers, it'll probably be hard to monetize its users as extensively as those social networks. With that in mind, Snapchat might be left with two options going forward—either expand its services in a radical new (and more profitable) direction, or sell to a Tech Big Fish for a whole lot of money." Read more of this story at Slashdot.       | | 12:58 pm |
| | 1:45 pm |
| | 10:03 am |
Rise of the Super-High-Res Notebook Display http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/I7orlghN17A/story01.htm http://slashdot.feedsportal.com/c/35028/f/647410/s/352107e2/sc/5/l/0Lhardware0Bslashdot0Borg0Cstory0C130C120C230C0A3372490Crise0Eof0Ethe0Esuper0Ehigh0Eres0Enotebook0Edisplay0Dutm0Isource0Frss10B0Amainlinkanon0Gutm0Imedium0Ffeed/story01.htm MojoKid writes "Mobile device displays continue to evolve and along with the advancements in technology, resolution continues to scale higher, from Apple's Retina Display line to high resolution IPS and OLED display in various Android and Windows phone products. Notebooks are now also starting to follow the trend, driving very high resolution panels approaching 4K UltraHD even in 13-inch ultrabook form factors. Lenovo's Yoga 2 Pro, for example, is a three pound, .61-inch thick 13.3-inch ultrabook that sports a full QHD+ IPS display with a 3200X1800 native resolution. Samsung's ATIV 9 Plus also boast the same 3200X1800 13-inch panel, while other recent releases from ASUS and Toshiba are packing 2560X1440 displays as well. There's no question, machines like Lenovo's Yoga 2 Pro are really nice and offer a ton of screen real estate for the money but just how useful is a 3 or 4K display in a 13 to 15-inch design? Things can get pretty tight at these high resolutions and you'll end up turning screen magnification up in many cases so fonts are clear and things are legible. Granted, you can fit a lot more on your desktop but it raises the question, isn't 1080p enough?" Read more of this story at Slashdot.       | | 7:01 am |
| | 12:59 am |
| | 4:02 am |
| | 12:59 am |
| | Sunday, December 22nd, 2013 | | 11:25 pm |
| | 10:22 pm |
Asm.js Gets Faster http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/2DkEtEwO3Tk/story01.htm http://slashdot.feedsportal.com/c/35028/f/647410/s/351cc5af/sc/4/l/0Ldevelopers0Bslashdot0Borg0Cstory0C130C120C220C2222250A0Casmjs0Egets0Efaster0Dutm0Isource0Frss10B0Amainlinkanon0Gutm0Imedium0Ffeed/story01.htm mikejuk writes "Asm.js is a subset of standard JavaScript that is simple enough for JavaScript engines to optimize. Now Mozilla claims that with some new improvements it is at worst only 1.5 times slower than native code. How and why?The problem with JavaScript as an assembly language is that it doesn't support the range of datatypes that are needed for optimization. This is good for human programmers because they can simply use a numeric variable and not worry about the difference between int, int32, float, float32 or float64. JavaScript always uses float64 and this provides maximum precision, but not always maximum efficiency. The big single improvement that Mozilla has made to its SpiderMonkey engine is to add a float32 numeric type to asm.js. This allows the translation of float32 arithmetic in a C/C++ program directly into float32 arithmetic in asm.js. This is also backed up by an earlier float32 optimization introduced into Firefox that benefits JavaScript more generally. Benchmarks show that firefox f32 i.e. with the float32 type is still nearly always slower than native code, it is now approaching the typical speed range of native code. Mozilla think that this isn't the last speed improvement they can squeeze from JavaScript. So who needs native code now?" Read more of this story at Slashdot.       | | 9:19 pm |
|
[ << Previous 20 -- Next 20 >> ]
|