Slashdot's Journal
[Most Recent Entries]
[Calendar View]
[Friends]
Below are 20 journal entries, after skipping by the 120 most recent ones recorded in
Slashdot's LiveJournal:
[ << Previous 20 -- Next 20 >> ]
| Monday, December 30th, 2013 | | 3:20 pm |
| | 2:36 pm |
Brain Function "Boosted For Days After Reading a Novel" http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/6_TuSGgtsTQ/story01.htm http://slashdot.feedsportal.com/c/35028/f/647410/s/3556a04f/sc/14/l/0Lscience0Bslashdot0Borg0Cstory0C130C120C30A0C1362130Cbrain0Efunction0Eboosted0Efor0Edays0Eafter0Ereading0Ea0Enovel0Dutm0Isource0Frss10B0Amainlinkanon0Gutm0Imedium0Ffeed/story01.htm cold fjord writes "The Independent reports, 'Being pulled into the world of a gripping novel can trigger actual, measurable changes in the brain that linger for at least five days after reading ... The new research, carried out at Emory University ... found that reading a good book may cause heightened connectivity in the brain and neurological changes that persist in a similar way to muscle memory. The changes were registered in the left temporal cortex, an area of the brain associated with receptivity for language, as well as the primary sensory motor region of the brain. Neurons of this region have been associated with tricking the mind into thinking it is doing something it is not, a phenomenon known as grounded cognition — for example, just thinking about running, can activate the neurons associated with the physical act of running. "The neural changes that we found associated with physical sensation and movement systems suggest that reading a novel can transport you into the body of the protagonist," said neuroscientist Professor Gregory Berns, lead author of the study. "We already knew that good stories can put you in someone else's shoes in a figurative sense. Now we're seeing that something may also be happening biologically."'" Read more of this story at Slashdot.       | | 1:51 pm |
The Rise of Hoax News http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/4Z9NG1HK60U/story01.htm http://slashdot.feedsportal.com/c/35028/f/647410/s/35564c93/sc/38/l/0Lnews0Bslashdot0Borg0Cstory0C130C120C30A0C130A220A0Cthe0Erise0Eof0Ehoax0Enews0Dutm0Isource0Frss10B0Amainlinkanon0Gutm0Imedium0Ffeed/story01.htm Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "Reporter Luke O'Neil writes that 2013 was journalism's year of bungles: the New Jersey waitress who received a homophobic comment on the receipt from a party she had served; Samsung paying Apple $1 billion in nickels; former NSA chief Michael Hayden's assassination; #CutForBieber; Nelson Mandela's death pic; that eagle snatching a child off the ground on YouTube; Jimmy Kimmel's 'twerk fail' video; and Sarah Palin taking a job with Al-Jazeera America (an obviously satirical story that even suckered in The Washington Post). All these stories had one thing in common: They seemed too tidily packaged, too neat, 'too good to check,' as they used to say, to actually be true. 'Any number of reporters or editors at any of the hundreds of sites that posted these Platonic ideals of shareability could've told you that they smelled, but in the ongoing decimation of the publishing industry, fact-checking has been outsourced to the readers,' writes O'Neil. 'This is not a glitch in the system. It is the system. Readers are gullible, the media is feckless, garbage is circulated around, and everyone goes to bed happy and fed.' O'Neil says that the stories he's written this year that took the least amount of time and effort usually did the most traffic while his more in-depth, reported pieces didn't stand a chance against riffs on things predestined to go viral. That's the secret that Upworthy, BuzzFeed, MailOnline, Viral Nova, and their dozens of knockoffs have figured out: You don't need to write anymore—just write a good headline and point. 'As Big Viral gets bigger, traditional media organizations are scrambling to keep pace,' concludes O'Neil. 'We the media have betrayed your trust, and the general public has taken our self-sanctioned lowering of standards as tacit permission to lower their own.'" Read more of this story at Slashdot.       | | 1:09 pm |
Is a Super-Sized iPad the Future of Education? http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/Qdtlly_aYas/story01.htm http://slashdot.feedsportal.com/c/35028/f/647410/s/355611a2/sc/4/l/0Lnews0Bslashdot0Borg0Cstory0C130C120C290C23142190Cis0Ea0Esuper0Esized0Eipad0Ethe0Efuture0Eof0Eeducation0Dutm0Isource0Frss10B0Amainlinkanon0Gutm0Imedium0Ffeed/story01.htm theodp writes "Perhaps people are reading too much into Apple CEO Tim Cook's 'Big Plans' for 2014, but hopes are high that the New Year will bring a biggie-sized iPad. Over at Forbes, Anthony Wing Kosner asks, Will The Large Screen iPad Pro Be Apple's First In A Line Of Desktop Touch Devices?. 'Rumors of a large [12.9"] iPad are many and constant,' notes ComputerWorld's Mike Elgan, 'but they make sense only if the tablet is a desktop for schools.' Elgan adds, 'Lots of schools are buying iPads for kids to use. But iPads don't make a lot of sense for education. For starters, their screens are too small for the kinds of interactive textbooks and apps that Apple wants the education market to create. They're also too small for collaborative work. iPads run mobile browsers, rather than full browsers, so kids can't use the full range of HTML5 sites.' Saying that 'Microsoft has fumbled the [post-PC] transition badly,' Elgan argues that 'the battle for the future of education is likely to be between whatever Google turns the Chromebook into against whatever Apple turns the iPad into.'" Read more of this story at Slashdot.       | | 11:10 am |
| | 8:22 am |
| | 5:41 am |
Citizen Science: Who Makes the Rules? http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/IVqI1awqz0U/story01.htm http://slashdot.feedsportal.com/c/35028/f/647410/s/35523639/sc/32/l/0Lscience0Bslashdot0Borg0Cstory0C130C120C30A0C0A5432390Ccitizen0Escience0Ewho0Emakes0Ethe0Erules0Dutm0Isource0Frss10B0Amainlinkanon0Gutm0Imedium0Ffeed/story01.htm New submitter UnderCoverPenguin writes "At MakeZine, David Lang talks about the some of the legal issues around a planned, amateur science 'expedition,' as well as some other amateur science projects. In the not too distant past, most science was amateur. Over the past 20 or so years, society has been making it harder for amateurs to do real science, despite the technical costs falling. With the recent upswing of the 'maker movement,' amateur science has seen an increase as well, but is running into an assortment of legal issues. (An exception is astronomy, where amateurs continue to play important roles. Of course, astronomy doesn't involve chemicals or other (currently) 'scary stuff.') Can amateur science make a come-back? Or are the legal obstacles too entrenched?" Read more of this story at Slashdot.       | | 5:41 am |
Citizen Science: Who Makes the Rules? http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/IVqI1awqz0U/story01.htm http://slashdot.feedsportal.com/c/35028/f/647410/s/35523639/sc/32/l/0Lscience0Bslashdot0Borg0Cstory0C130C120C30A0C0A5432390Ccitizen0Escience0Ewho0Emakes0Ethe0Erules0Dutm0Isource0Frss10B0Amainlinkanon0Gutm0Imedium0Ffeed/story01.htm New submitter UnderCoverPenguin writes "At MakeZine, David Lang talks about the some of the legal issues around a planned, amateur science 'expedition,' as well as some other amateur science projects. In the not too distant past, most science was amateur. Over the past 20 or so years, society has been making it harder for amateurs to do real science, despite the technical costs falling. With the recent upswing of the 'maker movement,' amateur science has seen an increase as well, but is running into an assortment of legal issues. (An exception is astronomy, where amateurs continue to play important roles. Of course, astronomy doesn't involve chemicals or other (currently) 'scary stuff.') Can amateur science make a come-back? Or are the legal obsicles too entrenched?" Read more of this story at Slashdot.       | | 2:02 am |
| | Sunday, December 29th, 2013 | | 11:39 pm |
| | 11:39 pm |
| | 10:30 pm |
| | 9:32 pm |
| | 8:18 pm |
| | 7:05 pm |
Chromebooks Have a Lucrative Year; Should WinTel Be Worried? http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/LxcSGAdcvKk/story01.htm http://slashdot.feedsportal.com/c/35028/f/647410/s/354f5f68/sc/21/l/0Lhardware0Bslashdot0Borg0Cstory0C130C120C290C1952420Cchromebooks0Ehave0Ea0Elucrative0Eyear0Eshould0Ewintel0Ebe0Eworried0Dutm0Isource0Frss10B0Amainlinkanon0Gutm0Imedium0Ffeed/story01.htm Chromebooks, and ChromeOS have come a long way, and this year two of the best selling laptops at Amazon are Chromebooks. Computerworld calls it a punch in the gut for Microsoft. "As of late Thursday, the trio retained their lock on the top three places on Amazon's best-selling-laptop list in the order of Acer, Samsung and Asus. Another Acer Chromebook, one that sports 32GB of on-board storage space -- double the 16GB of Acer's lower-priced model -- held the No. 7 spot on the retailer's top 10. Chromebooks' holiday success at Amazon was duplicated elsewhere during the year, according to the NPD Group, which tracked U.S. PC sales to commercial buyers such as businesses, schools, government and other organizations. ... By NPD's tallies, Chromebooks accounted for 21% of all U.S. commercial notebook sales in 2013 through November, and 10% of all computers and tablets. Both shares were up massively from 2012; last year, Chromebooks accounted for an almost-invisible two-tenths of one percent of all computer and tablet sales." Read more of this story at Slashdot.       | | 5:46 pm |
| | 4:34 pm |
| | 4:34 pm |
| | 3:32 pm |
| | 2:27 pm |
|
[ << Previous 20 -- Next 20 >> ]
|