Indra
rindra
.:.::
May 2020
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31

Indra [userpic]
Patiesības meklēšana VS "ABSOLŪTA runas brīvība"

Lūdzu, izlasiet šos rakstus:


1

"When we hear these things about free speech and how great it was and how great it could be, this is a kind of free speech that allows for false information to be treated as equal to facts and issues, real issues. [..] So the problem with the free speech debate is the way it’s talked about now, this ABSOLUTIST (izcēlums mans) free speech. It is an antithesis to what goes on in the academy."

un

"We don’t for instance require students to relitigate whether or not gravity exists when we teach them physics. We base, you have to, you know, you have to move much quicker than that to teach them stuff based upon a set of accepted knowledge, accepted ideas. So the academy doesn’t work that way. "

No:

https://medium.com/@CitationsPodcst/episode-88-the-mythical-bygone-glory-days-of-free-speech-8b2508d5e5de

(vai klausieties podkāstu)



2

"[..] when we intend to pursue knowledge generation and truth, we design highly regulated speech forums—for instance, scientific, professional, and academic journals, or civil and criminal procedures. Standard competition theories that encourage the “survival of the fittest,” they suggest, do not necessarily imply that superior goods will be delivered as a result. "

No:

https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2019/02/the-illusion-of-a-marketplace-of-ideas-and-the-right-to-truth/

(abi raksti via [info]slikts)


3

"They pose as “censored” revolutionaries – claiming that if they aren’t offered big name panel shows and cosy interviews, this is simply further proof of the liberal conspiracy to silence the capital-t Truth."

No:
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/owen-jones-far-right-assault-free-speech-a9064636.html

Un pēc tam izbanojiet visus nacīšus un to veicinātājus (upd: Tādus veicinātājus, kas regulāri nāk žurnālā un izplata demagoģiju un ir 100 reizes pierādījuši, ka nespēj sekot argumentam.)

Parunājam par nopietnām lietām.

Nevis par definīcijām saistībā ar jautājumiem, kuru atbildei būtu jābūt saprotamai acumirklī, piemēram, ka nav ok internetā aicināt uz vardarbību. Ne pret vienu. Ne pret bērniem. Ne pret musulmaņiem. Ne pret ebrejiem. The list goes on.

"ABSOLŪTA runas brīvība" ir tukša kopa ("Freedom of speech and expression, therefore, MAY NOT BE RECOGNIZED AS BEING ABSOLUTE (izcēlums mans)", no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech ).

Atsaukšanās uz šādu tukšu jēdzienu ir naida uzskatu veicināšanas stratēģija.

Te nav delfi.
Te ir ciba.
Nevajag dot cieņu tiem, kam tā nepienākas.