302cc9b4780f8cbef6f70c3a8417913050b6aafb ([info]mindbound) rakstīja,
@ 2015-12-09 14:03:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Garastāvoklis:working
Mūzika:Ugasanie - Eye Of Tunguska: The Bodies Under The Snow
Entry tags:computers, news, science

Finally, the expected speed-ups from D-Wave, “~ 108 times faster than an optimized implementation of QMC on a single core”.

Update: This is a bit embarrassing, I should have paid closer attention to the performance comparison graph (Fig. 4). There is indeed an exponential speed-up over simulated annealing but only a linear one over QMC. Also, see S. Aaronson’s article for more in-depth explanation of some of the potential problems with the interpretation of the results.



(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)


[info]mindbound
2015-12-09 14:37 (saite)
108 ≠ 108

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


(Lasīt komentārus) -

Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?