urn:lj:klab.lv:atom1:hot_space hot_space hot_space i.zustrups@gmail.com hot_space 2008-02-08T10:22:30Z 2008-02-08T10:22:30Z urn:lj:klab.lv:atom1:hot_space:387 2008-02-07T10:32:00 2008-02-07T10:32:00 2008-02-08T10:22:30Z 2008-02-08T10:22:30Z lūk, entuziasts ir izvēlējies dzejoļa formu savas domas paušanai. ar to viņš piedalās diskusijā par neo-klasiskās ekonomikas paradigmas dominējošo ietekmi un alternatīvu skatpunktu ierobežotās iespējas tiks saklausītiem.<br /><br />viņa ievads:<br /><br />as a marxist i have been on the receiving end<br />of the attack i'm about to launch at the neo classical paradigm<br /><br />nosaukums (presumably):<br /><br />it can't be refuted<br /><br /><br />dzejolis:<br /><br />and of course dear tombo here<br />is trying to say alternative formalisms<br />might be more fruitful<br />i doubt a scrap job<br />is worth it<br />why lose the practical value of a a shared formalism<br />for the field<br />just to make a class view point<br />a little reconstruction<br />of the present paradigm<br />labels ,distinctions etc<br />can yield this ...if wanted<br /><br />the paradigm per se<br />like any paradigm<br />no content<br />its an instrumentality<br />and until that instrumentality<br />collapses under its own conflicting "results "<br /><br />---and it hasn't ---<br /><br />or runs up against a reality it dare no longer ignore or assume away<br /><br />-- it has (the great depression) ---<br /><br />it can't reform itself to deal with effectively<br /><br />---- god bless keynes ---<br /><br />it will serve<br /><br />---at least to the extent it's seen as such ..a shared formalism and not reified -----<br />------<br /><br />it's<br />a dynamic evolving but by necessity<br />radically incomplete set<br />of theorems and the assumptions<br />they require<br />and more centrally as a science<br />the various conflicting interpretations<br />of these formalisms<br /><br />the great leap from analytics to abduction<br />ie to "model" claims<br /><br />taken as a totality<br />these formalisms<br />are often obviously mutually contradictory<br />of course they are<br />the field develops thru the eruption<br />of inconsistent conclusions<br />as much as model failure<br /><br />big deal what's new here