gnidrologs ([info]gnidrologs) rakstīja,
@ 2019-11-15 09:39:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
sātanistus nepiš embriji šmembriji - it's baby killing that matters
This embryo shit is such a red herring considering we are already on late term abortion stage.
The baby is outside the mother's womb. He is breathing on his own, and they can still kill him. It's obvious l1bruls don't give a flying fuck about embryos, abortion is about getting rid of the pregnancy, full stop, at any stage. If it comes to outright infanticide, as the procedure described by this lunatic basically entails, so be it.

And you want to know why this is? Because once you deny that a human being has a soul and a destiny, and that the embryo is not a separate "entity" but part of the entire existence of the being, then what difference does it make whether you are killing a fetus or a full fledged baby? You have already denied the possibility of killing being wrong at any point at the outset. If there is no soul then a full grown human being is as much as a clump of cells as a fetus and killing one is no different from killing the other. And it was to demonstrate this that l1bruls are pushing for abortion, not the other way around. They are not using moral relativism to justify abortion, they are using abortion to justify moral relativism and their materialistic world view. That was always the point, all the other arguments were utter bullshit.


Pie tam, kas raksturīgi, arī šajā Partijas aktīvisma atzarā vērojama cult-like uzvedība.
https://shoutyourabortion.com/


abortion for fun tee hee


(Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)


[info]ctulhu
2019-11-15 12:13 (saite)
Tajā angliskajā tekstā ir sarakstītas klajas aplamības. Nu kāds tur soul un destiny? Vot ja neesot soul tad varot slepkavot. Pardon ticīgu pāķu līmenis.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Diskusija)


[info]gnidrologs
2019-11-15 12:32 (saite)
Jā, abortionisti ir ticīgi pāķi.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]ctulhu
2019-11-15 13:14 (saite)
Man šķiet ka nav nekādu tādu ``abortionistu``. Es piemēram neesmu ``abortionists``, t.i. ir skaidrs ka aborts ir nevēlama destruktīva manipulācija, kā jebkura ķirurģiska iejaukšanās, traumē organismu un tā tālāk. Tas ir avārijas variants ja kontracepcija kaut kādu iemeslu dēļ nav nostrādājusi. Vispār vajag lietot kontracepciju nevis orientēties uz abortiem, t.sk. ir jāpiedomā pie vīriešu ķīmiskās kontracepcijas, kas arī tiek darīts.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?