|
6. Aug 2016|20:00 |
http://meaningness.com/metablog/communal-vs-systematic-politics
Lūk, vēl viens saskata linku starp postmodernismu un notiekošo politikā. Var teikt, ka šobrīd tiek pļauts pirms daždesmit gadiem rietumu izglītības sistēmā sasētais.
Politics isn’t about sense, facts, or policy anymore.
...
The bad part is that the systematic mode is profoundly psychologically unnatural. For many people it seems dehumanizing, alienating, incomprehensible, senseless, meaningless, and utterly immoral. This has been obvious for a hundred years.
Undergraduate education explains the systematic structures of justification [4] which is why, I think, the new politics correlates so strongly with lack of a college degree.
The natural human alternative is the communal mode: unstructured, egalitarian, empathic, local, tribal, familiar, and comfortable. This mode—I’ve also called it “choiceless”—feels profoundly right. We evolved to live in such societies; they fit our psychology in a way systematic ones cannot.
...
4. Unfortunately, as I explained in a recent post, this is decreasingly true, due to obfuscatory postmodernism. This may be one reason for the rise of anti-systematic politics: even many of the college-educated now fail to understand the value of systematicity. |
|