31. Marts 2009

• 31.3.09 08:22
• "In February 1835, Carlyle shared a draft of the first book with Mill. At midnight on the evening of March 6, a hysterical Mill appeared at Carlyle’s door and delivered the news that one of his servants mistook Carlyle’s manuscript for wastepaper and threw it in the fire."
• 2 piezīmesvieta jūsu piezīmēm

• 31.3.09 08:34
• Kādu grāmatiņu palasīt?
  
  http://www.scribd.com/
  
  (kamēr Harija Potera autore nav piespiedusi aiztaisīt šo ciet)
• 2 piezīmesvieta jūsu piezīmēm

• 31.3.09 21:01
• Valdis Zatlers: "Notikumu gaitai bija tandence pasliktināties."
• 0 piezīmesvieta jūsu piezīmēm

• 31.3.09 21:04
• "Lietojot medicīnisku terminoloģiju, ir dzirdes un redzes traucējumi"
• 0 piezīmesvieta jūsu piezīmēm

• 31.3.09 21:17
• A Peters runā aizmidzis?
• 3 piezīmesvieta jūsu piezīmēm

• 31.3.09 21:19
• Vēl nevar saprast, kāpēc Ķibilds saka "Vaira" un "Zatlers", nevis "Valdis"?
• 1 piezīmesvieta jūsu piezīmēm

• 31.3.09 21:51
• "To grasp the genuine relationship between an original and a translation
  requires an investigation analogous to the argumentation by which a critique of
  cognition would have to prove the impossibility of an image theory. There it is a
  matter of showing that in cognition there could be no objectivity, not even a claim to
  it, if it dealt with images of reality; here it can be demonstrated that no translation
  would be possible if in its ultimate essence it strove for likeness to the original. For in
  its afterlife -- which could not be called that if it were not a transformation and a
  renewal of something living -- the original undergoes a change. Even words with
  fixed meaning can undergo a maturing process.[..]
  
  Where a text is identical with truth or dogma, where it is supposed to be
  "the true language" in all its literalness and without the mediation of meaning, this
  text is unconditionally translatable. In such case translations are called for only
  because of the plurality of languages. Just as, in the original, language and revelation
  are one without any tension, so the translation must be one with the original in the
  form of the interlinear version, in which literalness and freedom are united. For to
  some degree all great texts contain their potential translation between the lines; this is
  true to the highest degree of sacred writings. The interlinear version of the Scriptures
  is the prototype or ideal of all translation."
  Walter Benjamin, "The Task of the Translator"
• 1 piezīmesvieta jūsu piezīmēm