There's life - Mūžvecā tēma: Krievija kā drauds AEiropai [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
re:

[ userinfo | sc userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Mūžvecā tēma: Krievija kā drauds AEiropai [Mar. 6th, 2009|11:28 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell A Friend Next Entry
[Tags|, , ]
[ausīs |Boredoms]

(kāds) Patriks Ārmstrongs saka tā: "[..]  The actual problems of the post-communist countries are all similar: corruption, outdated industry, bad work habits, decaying infrastructure, crashing demographics and fragile economies. Countries that had the full 70-year dose of communism are worse off than those who received the 40-year dose to be sure, but the problems are shared. NATO is not the answer to any of them.
There is no better illustration of this truth than the parlous state of Ukraine today. The post “Orange Revolution” obsession with NATO has only exacerbated the political division in the country.
And finally, why would Russia, which is surviving the financial storm better than most – if not all – of its neighbors, want to acquire these countries anyway? Much more trouble (and expense) than they’re worth. After all, there wasn’t much stopping Russia from seizing most of Georgia last August if it had wanted to".

Avots šeit.

linkh

Comments:
From:[info]divi_g
Date:March 7th, 2009 - 12:09 am
(Link)
Atbildot uz autora jautājumu - sliškom mnogo piļi, nav jau 20.gads, tādēļ paņems pa gabalam...
[User Picture]
From:[info]eerenpreiss
Date:March 7th, 2009 - 12:21 am
(Link)
Nez, ko tieši?
From:[info]divi_g
Date:March 7th, 2009 - 12:48 am
(Link)
Nu, paņems Gruziju pakāpeniski, visticamāk, caur režīma maiņu; Ukrainā, piemēram, iet uz to pašu pusi.
From:[info]eerenpreiss
Date:March 7th, 2009 - 12:58 am
(Link)
Kad Krievijai tas būs ne tikai ģeopolitiski, bet arī ekonomiski izdevīgi, lūk, īstais jautājums.
From:[info]divi_g
Date:March 7th, 2009 - 10:43 am
(Link)
Šaubos, vai Krievija tik ļoti par ekonomiku satraucas. Nekad nav satraukusies :)