| Atbilde-viedoklis uz kādu jautājumu 1998.gada septembrī |
[Jul. 3rd, 2008|12:08 am] |
Tātad, ir 1998.gads un Rietumvalstīs kniešas:
J: Can the appointment of Primakov be interpreted as a defeat for the reformist policies of Yeltsin?
A: ... The appointment of
Primakov signifies a major weakening not only of the reform policies of
1992-1998 but, perhaps even more alarmingly, a de facto constitutional
coup d'etat: the installation of a government responsible to the
parliament, rather than the President. Given very deep ideological
divisions in the Duma and its inability to form a working majority on
anything except opposition to the President, a government controlled by
the Duma could lead to a paralysis of power. I honestly wish this
prediction be wrong but the Duma's record until now gives little ground
for optimism. |
|
|
| Comments: |
Gudrs vīrs tas Leons bija. | |
![[info]](http://klab.lv/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}